Mr Rosario Poidimani / Guy Stair Sainty Esq.

 

Here the verdict issued by the Tribunale di Vicenza on 5th August 2004

Guy Stair Sainty completely won the judgement

"reclamo ex art. 669 terdecies cpc contro l’ordinanza del Tribunale di Vicenza del 4.06.04 " 

against Mr Rosario Poidimani

 

The Tribunale di Vicenza, after having seen the article  669 terdecies cpc, "in accoglimento del reclamo depositato in data 24.06.04 da Stair Sainty Guy, REVOCA il provvedimento ex art. 700 cpc del 4.06.04 emesso dal tribunale di Vicenza nella causa n. 8304/2003 RG e oggetto del presente reclamo.

Spese al definitivo".

 

We should like to know the replies of Mr Rosario Poidimani to the following questions: 

1) In the verdict he introduces himself as H.R.H. Dom Rosario Poidimani Italian Citizen. Does he have this style on his official documents issued by the Italian Republic?

Indeed, HRH the Prince Victor Emanuel of Savoy and HRH the Prince Amedeo of Savoy Aosta have this style on their birth certificates. Also the King of Spain, born in Italy, has on his Italian birth certificate the style of HRH the Infante Don Juan Carlos de Bourbon.

Why was the style HRH and DOM used by Mr Rosario Poidimani to introduce himself in the cause against Guy Stair Sainty Esq., we should be most interested to see his Italian document where such styles appear.

 

2) Mr Rosario Poidimani affirms he lost a business of 400,000,000,00 Euros. This amount is huge!

As tax returns are public we should be also interested - if possible - to know how high his income is?

We have never found - until now - his name quoted in “Il Mondo Economico” or “Il Sole 24 Ore”, the most famous Italian economic publications.

 

3) In Italy all the Italian Citizens are subjected to the Law 3rd March 1951 where at Article 8 it is written: “Art. 8- Excluding that laid out in art. 7, the conferral of honours, decorations, awards of knighthood, in any form or with any name whatsoever, by bodies, associations or individuals is prohibited. Violators will be punished with prison sentences from six months to two years and with a fine of between two hundred and fifty thousand lire and five hundred thousand lire”. 

Does it correspond to the truth that he grants former Portuguese Orders?

 

4) In his site at http://www.realcasaportuguesa.org/media/docs/ordini/vilavicosa1.jpg Mr Rosario Poidimani inserted documents that never were issued by the ICOC and were signed by a person who was not member of ICOC at the time when he should have signed such documents.

 

5) We should be most interested to receive a copy of the ICOC Register in which Mrs Maria Pia di Braganza is inserted as the Head of the Royal House of Portugal, because such copy does not exist and the General Secretary in charge at that time always publicly denied that the Executive Committee examined the claims of Mrs Maria Pia di Braganza.

 

6) Why Mrs Maria Pia di Braganza surrendered her "orders" as a claimant to the Throne of Portugal to Mr Rosario Poidimani inserting in her adbication the wrong affirmation that her "orders" were "recognized" by the ICOC 

(this never happened) and we should be also interested to know which moral value this document might have founded as it is on another document which never existed.

 

7) Why did Mr Rosario Poidimani forbide the present President of ICOC to meet Mrs Maria Pia di Braganza when he was asked this through Gen Dr. Amos Spiazzi di Corte Regia?

 

8) Why was Mrs Maria Pia di Braganza cremated?

 

We should have many other questions to ask, but we will do so in time

 

May we hope to receive a reply to these questions?

 

home